Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Le Sortudo
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Piggy Riches™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.38%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,400×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Hacksaw Gaming and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.27% against 96.38% — Piggy Riches™ is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,400×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Sortudo does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Piggy Riches™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Sortudo reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
