Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Thunderstruck® Stormchaser
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Mega Don Triple Threat
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.18%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Vikings Video Slot™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,600×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Thunderstruck® Stormchaser vs Mega Don Triple Threat
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.18% — Mega Don Triple Threat is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Thunderstruck® Stormchaser vs Vikings Video Slot™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Microgaming and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.05%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Vikings Video Slot™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
