Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Bonus Bunnies
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,950×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Blood & Shadow
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,666×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Bonus Bunnies vs Blood & Shadow
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.14% against 96.13%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,950× and 6,666×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Bonus Bunnies does not publish a rating.
Bonus Bunnies vs Milkshake™ XXXtreme
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.04% — Bonus Bunnies is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,950× and 7,100×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Bonus Bunnies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Bonus Bunnies returns more in theory over the long run, while Milkshake™ XXXtreme reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




