Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Harlequin Carnival
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,861×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Magic Lab™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,999×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Fantasy, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.14% against 96.10%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,861× and 5,999×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Harlequin Carnival does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Harlequin Carnival returns more in theory over the long run, while Magic Lab™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
