Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Infectious 5 xWays®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 55,555×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Wish Master™ Megaways™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 27,018×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Nolimit City and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.02% against 96.07%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 55,555× against 27,018×, with Infectious 5 xWays® higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Infectious 5 xWays® does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Wish Master™ Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Infectious 5 xWays® reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
