Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

PG Soft

PG Soft

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.76% against 96.76%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pinata Wins does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — PG Soft and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.76% against 96.09% — Pinata Wins is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pinata Wins does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pinata Wins returns more in theory over the long run, while Bee Hive Bonanza reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)