Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.84% — Plushie Wins is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 67× against 100×, with Plushie Wins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against Low. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.65% against 96.88% — Imperial Riches™ is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 67× against 200×, with Imperial Riches™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Imperial Riches™ does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)