Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Crabby's Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 70,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Big Money Wheel
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Crabby's Gold vs Big Money Wheel
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.07% — Crabby's Gold is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.8×: 70,000× against 12,000×, with Crabby's Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Big Money Wheel does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Crabby's Gold vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
