Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Crazy Cows
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Blood
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Starburst Galaxy™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 17,288×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Crazy Cows vs Wild Blood
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.24% against 96.24%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100,000× and 100,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Crazy Cows vs Starburst Galaxy™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.24% against 96.00% — Crazy Cows is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.8×: 100,000× against 17,288×, with Crazy Cows higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Starburst Galaxy™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
