Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.20% — Fate's Fortune is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 8.0×: 40,160× against 5,000×, with Dragon Ship higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fate's Fortune returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragon Ship reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.26% — Divine Fortune Black is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 40,160× against 20,000×, with Dragon Ship higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune Black does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Divine Fortune Black returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragon Ship reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)