Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.08% against 86.00% — Fortune Teller is 10.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 33.2×: 5× against 166×, with 12 Zodiacs higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fortune Teller returns more in theory over the long run, while 12 Zodiacs reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)