Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Habanero

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Rhythm Nights does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 4.7×: 2,500× against 11,753×, with Rhythm Nights higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Rhythm Nights does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.51%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 2,500× against 3,000×, with Dynamite Diggin Doug higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Golden Colts returns more in theory over the long run, while Dynamite Diggin Doug reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)