Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 30,000× against 25,000×, with HammerFall higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gemix 100 returns more in theory over the long run, while HammerFall reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 86.00% — HammerFall is 10.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 30,000× against 22,360×, with HammerFall higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Add to the comparison (up to four)