Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.52% — Jade Magician is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 10,000× against 15,000×, with Jade Magician higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.40% against 96.00% — Hugo is 0.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 10,000× against 17,288×, with Starburst Galaxy™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Starburst Galaxy™ does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hugo returns more in theory over the long run, while Starburst Galaxy™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)