Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Moon Princess Extreme
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Stompin’ Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Mummy Hunter
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 37,295×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Moon Princess Extreme vs Stompin’ Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 50,000× and 50,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Moon Princess Extreme vs Mummy Hunter
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 86.00% — Moon Princess Extreme is 10.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 50,000× against 37,295×, with Moon Princess Extreme higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
