Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

NetEnt

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.45% — Starburst™ XXXtreme is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 10,000× against 16,800×, with Starburst™ XXXtreme higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Starburst™ XXXtreme does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.56% — Cosmic Cash is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.8×: 10,000× against 2,650×, with Moon Princess Stargazing higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cosmic Cash returns more in theory over the long run, while Moon Princess Stargazing reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Add to the comparison (up to four)