Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pilgrim of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Halloween Jack™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Haunted House
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 17,794×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pilgrim of Dead vs Halloween Jack™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.28% — Halloween Jack™ is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 10,000× against 7,100×, with Pilgrim of Dead higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Halloween Jack™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Halloween Jack™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Pilgrim of Dead reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Pilgrim of Dead vs Haunted House
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 92.00% — Pilgrim of Dead is 4.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 10,000× against 17,794×, with Haunted House higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pilgrim of Dead returns more in theory over the long run, while Haunted House reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
