Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sabaton
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Battle The Beast
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,047×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Black Mamba
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Sabaton vs Battle The Beast
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Battle The Beast does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 4,047×, with Sabaton higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Battle The Beast does not publish a rating.
Sabaton vs Black Mamba
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
