Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

NetEnt

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.14% — Viking Runecraft 100 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 15,000× against 2,983×, with Viking Runecraft 100 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Druid’s Magic does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Battleship Strike does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 15,000× against 13,272×, with Viking Runecraft 100 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Battleship Strike does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)