Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 93.72% against 95.87% — Lucky Diamonds is 2.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 33× and 33×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 93.72% against 86.00% — Wild Melon is 7.72 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 63.0×: 33× against 2,080×, with Super Fruit Blast higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Melon returns more in theory over the long run, while Super Fruit Blast reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Add to the comparison (up to four)