Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Melon
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.72%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 33×
- Reels
- 33
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Lucky Diamonds
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.87%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 33×
- Reels
- 33
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fruit & classic
VS
Jingle Bells Bonanza
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,186×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Melon vs Lucky Diamonds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 93.72% against 95.87% — Lucky Diamonds is 2.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 33× and 33×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Wild Melon vs Jingle Bells Bonanza
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 126.8×: 33× against 4,186×, with Jingle Bells Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jingle Bells Bonanza does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
