Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
5 Lions Reborn
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Jungle Spirit: Call of the Wild
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.47%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 5,000× against 7,700×, with Jungle Spirit: Call of the Wild higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jungle Spirit: Call of the Wild does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. 5 Lions Reborn returns more in theory over the long run, while Jungle Spirit: Call of the Wild reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
