Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
6 Jokers
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Reel Rush 2™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Hugo's Adventure
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
6 Jokers vs Reel Rush 2™
- Different format families: 6 Jokers is Cascading reels, Reel Rush 2™ is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.58%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 4,800×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Reel Rush 2™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Reel Rush 2™ returns more in theory over the long run, while 6 Jokers reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
6 Jokers vs Hugo's Adventure
- Different format families: 6 Jokers is Cascading reels, Hugo's Adventure is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.55% against 96.56%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
