Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Blazing Wilds Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 94.96%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jungle Rumble
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 94.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 11,001×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Jungle Rumble is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 94.96% against 94.00% — Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is 0.96 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 10,000× against 11,001×, with Jungle Rumble higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Blazing Wilds Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Jungle Rumble reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
