Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Habanero

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Jungle Rumble is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 94.96% against 94.00% — Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is 0.96 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 10,000× against 11,001×, with Jungle Rumble higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Blazing Wilds Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Jungle Rumble reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Reactoonz 100 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 94.96% against 96.20% — Reactoonz 100 is 1.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)