Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Book of Kingdoms
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.69%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Rome: The Golden Age
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 19,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.69% against 96.06% — Book of Kingdoms is 0.63 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 19,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Rome: The Golden Age does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
