Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cosmic Cash
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,650×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon, Wealth
VS
Hot Tuna
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Galaxy Babies
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,575×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cosmic Cash vs Hot Tuna
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.56% against 96.53%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,650× and 2,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Cosmic Cash vs Galaxy Babies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 2,650× against 1,575×, with Cosmic Cash higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
