Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cowboy Coins
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth, Wild west
VS
Judgemental
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.20% — Judgemental is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 30,000× against 15,000×, with Cowboy Coins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Judgemental does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Judgemental returns more in theory over the long run, while Cowboy Coins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
