Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Egyptian Fortunes
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt, East Asia
VS

Leprechaun goes Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS

Frontier Fortune
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 86.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 917×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Egyptian Fortunes vs Leprechaun goes Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.75% — Leprechaun goes Egypt is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 700× against 500×, with Egyptian Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Leprechaun goes Egypt returns more in theory over the long run, while Egyptian Fortunes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Egyptian Fortunes vs Frontier Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 86.00% — Egyptian Fortunes is 10.50 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 700× against 917×, with Frontier Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Egyptian Fortunes returns more in theory over the long run, while Frontier Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



