Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Fire Hot 20
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,234×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fire Hot 20 vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.56% — Mermaids Millions is 0.27 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Fire Hot 20 vs Scruffy Duck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.38% — Scruffy Duck is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,234× and 1,200×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Scruffy Duck does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Scruffy Duck returns more in theory over the long run, while Fire Hot 20 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)




