Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fire Portals
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.06% against 96.03%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fire Portals returns more in theory over the long run, while Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
