Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Hockey League

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.36%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
1,200×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sports
Free demo available →
VS

Hugo Goal

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.50%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
800×
Reels
800
Theme signals
Sports
Free demo available →
VS

Racing Royalty

Habanero

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
86.00%
Volatility
High
Win cap
1,324×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Sports
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Hockey League vs Hugo Goal

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.50% — Hugo Goal is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 1,200× against 800×, with Hockey League higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Hockey League does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hugo Goal returns more in theory over the long run, while Hockey League reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Sports.

Hockey League vs Racing Royalty

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.36% against 86.00% — Hockey League is 10.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,200× against 1,324×, with Racing Royalty higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Hockey League does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hockey League returns more in theory over the long run, while Racing Royalty reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Sports.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)