Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.51% — The Champions is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,200× against 1,400×, with The Champions higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Hockey League does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sports.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.82% — Football: Champions Cup is 0.46 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,200× against 700×, with Hockey League higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Hockey League does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Football: Champions Cup returns more in theory over the long run, while Hockey League reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sports.

Add to the comparison (up to four)