Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

NetEnt

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Lucky Dice is Cascading reels, Dragon Maiden is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.49%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lucky Dice returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragon Maiden reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Different format families: Lucky Dice is Cascading reels, Divine Fortune Megaways is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.09% — Lucky Dice is 0.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 5,000× against 4,500×, with Lucky Dice higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune Megaways does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Dragon Tribe Nolimit City42%