Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Tiger 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Divine Fortune Black
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.26%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.26% — Lucky Tiger 1000 is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 25,000× against 20,000×, with Lucky Tiger 1000 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Divine Fortune Black does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
