Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Money Stacks Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Money Stacks Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.06% — Money Stacks Megaways™ is 0.45 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,300×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Money Stacks Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
