Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Panther Queen
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
VS
Battle The Beast
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,047×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Panther Queen vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.56% — Mermaids Millions is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Panther Queen vs Battle The Beast
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Battle The Beast does not publish one.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 4,047×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Battle The Beast does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
