Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pixie Wings
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.67%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Wolf's Bane™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pixie Wings vs The Wolf's Bane™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.67% against 96.74% — The Wolf's Bane™ is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: The Wolf's Bane™ does not publish a rating.
Pixie Wings vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.67% against 96.56% — Pixie Wings is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
