Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Plushie Wins
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.84%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Imperial Riches™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
888 Dragons
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.84%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Plushie Wins vs Imperial Riches™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.84% against 96.88%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 100× against 200×, with Imperial Riches™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Imperial Riches™ does not publish a rating.
Plushie Wins vs 888 Dragons
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.84% against 96.84%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100× and 100×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
