Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Safari King
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Wolf Cub™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.49% against 96.34% — Safari King is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 2,500× against 2,100×, with Safari King higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Wolf Cub™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
