Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Craze
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 97.54%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Wealth
VS
Gem Crush™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,361×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.54% against 96.13% — Sweet Craze is 1.41 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 10,000× against 4,361×, with Sweet Craze higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Crush™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
