Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.54% against 96.13% — Sweet Craze is 1.41 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 10,000× against 4,361×, with Sweet Craze higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Crush™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Different format families: Sweet Craze is Cluster pays, Riches of Robin is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.54% against 96.65% — Sweet Craze is 0.89 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet Craze returns more in theory over the long run, while Riches of Robin reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)