Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.52%.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Sweet Kingdom higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Sweet Rush Bonanza is Cascading reels, Candy Tower is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 86.00% — Sweet Rush Bonanza is 10.50 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 5,000× against 3,177×, with Sweet Rush Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)