Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Temujin Treasures
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Pandora’s Treasure™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,368×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.13% — Temujin Treasures is 0.42 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 9,000× against 10,368×, with Pandora’s Treasure™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pandora’s Treasure™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Temujin Treasures returns more in theory over the long run, while Pandora’s Treasure™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
