Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Temujin Treasures
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Pandora’s Treasure™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,368×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Treasures of Kongar
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Temujin Treasures vs Pandora’s Treasure™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.13% — Temujin Treasures is 0.42 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 9,000× against 10,368×, with Pandora’s Treasure™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pandora’s Treasure™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Temujin Treasures returns more in theory over the long run, while Pandora’s Treasure™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Temujin Treasures vs Treasures of Kongar
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.20% — Temujin Treasures is 0.35 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 9,000× against 15,000×, with Treasures of Kongar higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Temujin Treasures returns more in theory over the long run, while Treasures of Kongar reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
