Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.44%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Druid’s Magic
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,983×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew is Cascading reels, Druid’s Magic is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and NetEnt — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.44% against 96.14% — The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 5,000× against 2,983×, with The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Druid’s Magic does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
